FZIIX vs. FLTMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FZIIX (Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I) and FLTMX (Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FZIIX returned 2.09%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for FLTMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FZIIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for FLTMX.

Performance

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIIX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than FLTMX's 0.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FZIIX having a 2.09% annualized return and FLTMX not far ahead at 2.18%.

FZIIX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 6.07%
• 3Y*: 3.93%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: 2.09%

FLTMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZIIX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I	0.97%	5.91%	1.02%	5.53%	-7.05%	0.93%	4.46%	6.47%	1.15%	4.51%
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	0.90%	6.02%	1.19%	5.52%	-6.92%	0.83%	4.36%	6.34%	1.89%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIIX and FLTMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004	0.84

The correlation between FZIIX and FLTMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZIIX vs. FLTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIIX

FZIIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FZIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FZIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FZIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FZIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FZIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FLTMX

FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FZIIX	FLTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.71	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.20	4.16	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.72	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	2.08	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	6.59	+0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the FLTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIIX and FLTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FZIIX	FLTMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.71	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.43	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.68	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.36	-0.35

Drawdowns

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIIX drawdown since its inception was -10.95%, smaller than the maximum FLTMX drawdown of -16.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIIX and FLTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZIIX	FLTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.95%	-16.13%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	-2.97%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.99%	-3.88%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.95%	-10.91%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.95%	-10.91%	-0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-1.09%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.64%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.94%	-0.03%

Volatility

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) have volatilities of 0.88% and 0.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZIIX	FLTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	0.89%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	1.83%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18%	2.28%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.04%	3.05%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.22%	3.24%	-0.02%

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTMX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZIIX vs. FLTMX - Dividend Comparison

FZIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than FLTMX's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	2.88%	3.70%	2.47%	2.42%	1.36%	1.67%	2.00%	2.39%	3.31%	2.64%	3.20%	2.36%
FZIIX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I	2.80%	3.61%	2.41%	2.34%	1.31%	1.76%	2.10%	2.52%	2.58%	2.56%	3.11%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZIIX and FLTMX in my portfolio?

FZIIX and FLTMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZIIX or FLTMX?

FLTMX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to FZIIX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIIX dropped -10.95% vs FLTMX's -16.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.