PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZIAX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZIAX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIAX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FZIAX has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 1.83%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


FZIAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
1.83%

VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIAX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZIAX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
0.68%5.58%0.80%5.17%-7.11%0.70%4.21%6.21%0.91%4.25%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIAX and VEA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

-0.08

The correlation between FZIAX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZIAX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIAX
FZIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FZIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIAX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZIAXVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.10

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.89

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.38

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.94

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.01

11.50

-5.50

FZIAX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIAX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZIAXVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.10

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.61

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.25

+0.68

Drawdowns

FZIAX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIAX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZIAXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-60.68%

+49.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-11.63%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

-13.45%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-29.71%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

-35.73%

+24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

0.00%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-13.29%

+11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

2.98%

-2.03%

Volatility

FZIAX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) is 0.89%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that FZIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZIAXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

5.73%

-4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

13.30%

-11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

15.66%

-13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.03%

16.55%

-13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

17.36%

-14.16%

FZIAX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIAX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZIAX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FZIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, which matches VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZIAX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.57%3.30%2.19%2.10%1.15%1.53%1.86%2.27%2.35%2.31%2.83%2.05%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZIAX and VEA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to FZIAX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIAX dropped -11.15% vs VEA's -60.68%.

FZIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZIAX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer