PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAFX vs. VTMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FZAFX having a 15.53% return and VTMGX slightly higher at 15.89%. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has outperformed VTMGX with an annualized return of 18.32%, while VTMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


FZAFX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.33%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.97%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
18.32%

VTMGX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.03%
YTD
15.89%
6M
19.15%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
15.53%14.68%18.15%35.80%-24.36%23.09%43.86%35.68%0.36%35.37%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.89%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and VTMGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.73

The correlation between FZAFX and VTMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. VTMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAFX
FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAFXVTMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.81

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

10.88

-1.13

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VTMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and VTMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAFXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.17

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.62

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.31

+0.53

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum VTMGX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and VTMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAFXVTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-60.58%

+29.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-11.67%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

-13.18%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

-29.71%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

-35.68%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-14.66%

+8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.01%

+0.27%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) is 4.18%, while Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that FZAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAFXVTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

4.97%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

12.53%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

15.11%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

15.87%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

16.54%

+4.22%

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMGX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAFX vs. VTMGX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VTMGX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
0.44%0.51%0.00%0.48%1.93%11.39%10.84%9.53%6.38%11.66%5.87%0.00%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.58%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAFX and VTMGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FZAFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs VTMGX's -60.58%.

VTMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAFX and VTMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer