PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAFX vs. BBLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than BBLIX's 1.58% return.


FZAFX

1D
2.82%
1M
-3.42%
6M
5.15%
YTD
6.27%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
16.91%
ALL TIME*
15.63%

BBLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.58%
YTD
1.58%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
6.27%14.68%18.15%35.80%-24.36%23.09%43.86%10.24%
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
1.58%12.07%15.83%23.86%-20.59%27.23%12.30%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and BBLIX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2019

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FZAFX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZAFX
FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLIX
BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAFXBBLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.17

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

2.11

+0.75

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and BBLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum BBLIX drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and BBLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAFXBBLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-33.49%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-3.63%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

-14.68%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

-28.06%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-1.80%

-6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-6.24%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

1.84%

+2.01%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAFXBBLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

0.00%

+6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

1.93%

+13.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

6.77%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

15.83%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

18.33%

+2.59%

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAFX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
9.39%9.54%4.20%0.28%1.45%3.27%0.34%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
0.48%0.51%0.00%0.48%1.93%11.39%10.84%9.53%6.38%11.66%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAFX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAFX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to BBLIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.

BBLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAFX and BBLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer