PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYX vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FYX having a 20.20% return and SCHA slightly higher at 20.80%. Over the past 10 years, FYX has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 12.34%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.


FYX

1D
1.75%
1M
1.38%
YTD
20.20%
6M
19.88%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
12.34%

SCHA

1D
0.85%
1M
3.65%
YTD
20.80%
6M
19.63%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
20.20%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%14.34%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
20.80%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FYX and SCHA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.97

The correlation between FYX and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYX vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYX
SCHA

Financial Services

17.5%
15.7%

Industrials

15.9%
15.4%

Healthcare

14.3%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
9.0%

Technology

10.9%
23.3%

Real Estate

8.4%
6.0%

Energy

6.4%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.4%

Utilities

1.6%
2.3%

Financial Services

FYX
17.5%
SCHA
15.7%

Industrials

FYX
15.9%
SCHA
15.4%

Healthcare

FYX
14.3%
SCHA
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FYX
11.7%
SCHA
9.0%

Technology

FYX
10.9%
SCHA
23.3%

Real Estate

FYX
8.4%
SCHA
6.0%

Energy

FYX
6.4%
SCHA
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FYX
5.7%
SCHA
2.6%

Basic Materials

FYX
4.5%
SCHA
4.2%

Communication Services

FYX
3.1%
SCHA
2.4%

Utilities

FYX
1.6%
SCHA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYXSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.24

4.43

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.12

16.30

+3.82

FYX vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYX and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYXSCHADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.35

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.33

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.58

-0.21

Drawdowns

FYX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYXSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.80%

-42.41%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-9.50%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-27.29%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-30.79%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

-42.41%

-6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-7.58%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.58%

-0.24%

Volatility

FYX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYXSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.81%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

12.84%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.29%

17.96%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

21.94%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

22.71%

+1.50%

FYX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than SCHA's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.68%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FYX and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to SCHA (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 12.34% vs 11.12% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.68% for FYX.

FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.04% for SCHA.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYX and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer