FYT vs. XSVM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYT returned 9.99%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.

Performance

FYT vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYT achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FYT has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 9.99%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.

FYT

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 15.42%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

XSVM

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 34.73%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYT vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	15.42%	4.00%	3.24%	22.90%	-14.05%	29.33%	9.82%	25.80%	-14.73%	7.14%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	16.87%	7.47%	2.30%	20.20%	-13.63%	56.36%	5.08%	30.01%	-12.33%	3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FYT and XSVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.88

The correlation between FYT and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYT vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYT	XSVM
Financial Services	25.5%	38.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	17.0%
Industrials	12.9%	6.7%
Real Estate	9.1%	5.0%
Technology	8.4%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	7.3%
Energy	7.2%	9.9%
Healthcare	6.1%	1.4%
Basic Materials	4.6%	1.9%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.9%
Utilities	2.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

FYT vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYT

FYT Risk / Return Rank: 61
FYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FYT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FYT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XSVM

XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 58
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYT vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYT	XSVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.88	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	3.46	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	10.66	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYT vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYT and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYT	XSVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.88	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.28	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.51	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.36	+0.03

Drawdowns

FYT vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and XSVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYT	XSVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.48%	-62.57%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-10.08%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.90%	-26.21%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.90%	-26.21%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.48%	-49.02%	-1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-1.47%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-11.57%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.27%	-0.32%

Volatility

FYT vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) is 4.66%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that FYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYT	XSVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	5.24%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	12.05%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.90%	18.59%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.56%	22.71%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.96%	25.09%	+0.87%

FYT vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYT vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XSVM's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.12%	0.94%	2.07%	1.50%	1.36%	1.19%	0.96%	1.44%	1.78%	1.16%	1.16%	0.96%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.81%	2.29%	1.69%	1.31%	1.79%	1.23%	1.21%	1.22%	2.54%	1.90%	2.29%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYT and XSVM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FYT and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FYT or XSVM?

XSVM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to FYT (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

Which ETF is better, FYT or XSVM?

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 12.72% vs 9.99% for FYT. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, FYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYT or XSVM?

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYT or XSVM?

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYT or XSVM?

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.

What is the main difference between FYT and XSVM?

FYT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.37% for XSVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.