FYT vs. XSMO
FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYT returned 10.03%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for XSMO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
FYT vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYT achieves a 17.40% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 23.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FYT has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 10.03%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.
FYT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 16.99%
- 1Y
- 37.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
FYT vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 17.40% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYT and XSMO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FYT and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYT vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYT
XSMO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYT
XSMO
Consumer Cyclical
FYT
XSMO
Industrials
FYT
XSMO
Real Estate
FYT
XSMO
Technology
FYT
XSMO
Consumer Defensive
FYT
XSMO
Energy
FYT
XSMO
Healthcare
FYT
XSMO
Basic Materials
FYT
XSMO
Communication Services
FYT
XSMO
Utilities
FYT
XSMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYT vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
FYT
XSMO
FYT vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 4.02 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 13.74 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.91 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.51 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.61 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FYT vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -58.06% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.89% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -24.76% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -29.62% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.48% | -39.39% | -11.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.52% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -11.13% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.60% | +0.35% |
Volatility
FYT vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) is 4.83%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that FYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 6.12% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 14.15% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 18.76% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 22.68% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 24.12% | +1.84% |
FYT vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYT vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than XSMO's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.10% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYT and XSMO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to FYT (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 14.63% vs 10.03% for FYT. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
FYT has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.52% for XSMO.
FYT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.36% for XSMO.
FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYT and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer