PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYT vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYT vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FYT having a 15.42% return and USVM slightly lower at 15.26%.


FYT

1D
-1.70%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
15.42%
6M
14.14%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
9.99%

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYT vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
15.42%4.00%3.24%22.90%-14.05%29.33%9.82%25.80%-14.73%3.50%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FYT and USVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FYT and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYT vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYT
USVM

Financial Services

25.5%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
11.1%

Industrials

12.9%
12.1%

Real Estate

9.1%
11.9%

Technology

8.4%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
5.0%

Energy

7.2%
4.4%

Healthcare

6.1%
11.0%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.8%

Utilities

2.7%
6.4%

Financial Services

FYT
25.5%
USVM
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FYT
13.3%
USVM
11.1%

Industrials

FYT
12.9%
USVM
12.1%

Real Estate

FYT
9.1%
USVM
11.9%

Technology

FYT
8.4%
USVM
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

FYT
7.2%
USVM
5.0%

Energy

FYT
7.2%
USVM
4.4%

Healthcare

FYT
6.1%
USVM
11.0%

Basic Materials

FYT
4.6%
USVM
1.8%

Communication Services

FYT
2.7%
USVM
2.8%

Utilities

FYT
2.7%
USVM
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYT vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYT
FYT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYT vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYTUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

3.66

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

13.76

-2.13

FYT vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYT and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYTUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.05

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.50

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.49

-0.10

Drawdowns

FYT vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYTUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.48%

-42.38%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.36%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-24.34%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.90%

-25.27%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.57%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-7.90%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.22%

+0.73%

Volatility

FYT vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 4.66% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYTUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

4.50%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

10.73%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

14.93%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

19.65%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.96%

22.01%

+3.95%

FYT vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYT vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.12%0.94%2.07%1.50%1.36%1.19%0.96%1.44%1.78%1.16%1.16%0.96%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYT and USVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 5.74% for FYT. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.

FYT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYT and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer