FYT vs. USVM
FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FYT returned 5.74%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
FYT vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FYT having a 15.42% return and USVM slightly lower at 15.26%.
FYT
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 34.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FYT vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 15.42% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 3.50% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYT and USVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FYT and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYT vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYT
USVM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYT
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
FYT
USVM
Industrials
FYT
USVM
Real Estate
FYT
USVM
Technology
FYT
USVM
Consumer Defensive
FYT
USVM
Energy
FYT
USVM
Healthcare
FYT
USVM
Basic Materials
FYT
USVM
Communication Services
FYT
USVM
Utilities
FYT
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYT vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
FYT
USVM
FYT vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYT | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 3.66 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 13.76 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYT | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.05 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.50 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
FYT vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYT | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -42.38% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.36% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -24.34% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -25.27% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.57% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -7.90% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.22% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FYT vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 4.66% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYT | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 4.50% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 10.73% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 14.93% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 19.65% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 22.01% | +3.95% |
FYT vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYT vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.12% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYT and USVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 5.74% for FYT. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.
FYT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYT and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer