PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLD vs. VAMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLD vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 11.60%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.91% annualized return.


FYLD

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.37%
6M
9.35%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
35.40%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

VAMO

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.79%
6M
2.95%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
5.91%
ALL TIME*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.76M$1.76M$3.02M
$89.36K$92.51K$952.26K

FYLD vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
21.93%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
7.33%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and VAMO is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLD vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FYLD vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYLDVAMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

3.47

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.10

9.99

+9.11

FYLD vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than VAMO's maximum drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and VAMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLDVAMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-41.84%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-5.55%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-11.61%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-17.25%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

-41.84%

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.78%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-9.83%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.93%

-0.07%

Volatility

FYLD vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.11%. This indicates that FYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLDVAMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.11%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

7.17%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

10.94%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.68%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

18.10%

-0.35%

FYLD vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYLD vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than VAMO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.31%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.61%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYLD and VAMO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYLD has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to VAMO (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.60% vs 5.91% for VAMO. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.61% for VAMO.

FYLD is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VAMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.65% for VAMO.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLD and VAMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer