FYLD vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

FYLD vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

FYLD

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.95%
• 6M: 13.04%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 19.81%
• 5Y*: 11.66%
• 10Y*: 11.33%

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	16.42%	4.75%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and POW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

FYLD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 92
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYLD	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.49	—	—

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYLD	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-18.37%	-26.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-18.37%	+15.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-4.33%	-4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FYLD	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.12%	32.94%	-20.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	32.94%	-16.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	32.94%	-15.20%

FYLD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYLD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.46%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYLD and POW in my portfolio?

FYLD and POW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FYLD or POW?

On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYLD or POW?

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYLD or POW?

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between FYLD and POW?

FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.75% for POW.