PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLD vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLD vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.73% return.


FYLD

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.37%
6M
9.35%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
35.40%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

POW

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.03%
6M
18.68%
YTD
38.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.76M$1.76M$3.02M
$1.11M$2.15M$2.58M

FYLD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and POW is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FYLD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYLDPOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.10

FYLD vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLDPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-28.02%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-18.49%

+17.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-5.73%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

FYLD vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLDPOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

34.40%

-22.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

34.40%

-18.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

34.40%

-16.65%

FYLD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYLD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.31%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
POW
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF
0.14%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYLD and POW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

FYLD is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLD and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer