FYHTX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FYHTX (Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FYHTX is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FYHTX returned 8.91%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FSPGX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FYHTX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 12.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 3.18% return.

FYHTX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -6.68%
• YTD: 12.59%
• 6M: 11.07%
• 1Y: 19.81%
• 3Y*: 10.15%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	12.59%	14.72%	4.73%	-8.62%	15.32%	26.43%	-3.84%	6.91%	-11.71%	6.00%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	3.18%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FYHTX and FSPGX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017	0.18

The correlation between FYHTX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FYHTX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYHTX

FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYHTX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.83	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	1.32	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	4.33	+1.93

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYHTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYHTX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYHTX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-32.66%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	-16.17%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.52%	-23.32%	+11.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-32.66%	+7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.85%	-5.35%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-6.36%	-5.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	4.92%	-1.67%

Volatility

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) is 3.07%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that FYHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYHTX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	5.94%	-2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	12.61%	-0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	16.21%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	21.61%	-5.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	21.56%	-7.10%

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYHTX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	2.60%	2.93%	3.78%	4.10%	57.34%	15.05%	0.00%	7.00%	12.49%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYHTX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FYHTX and FSPGX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYHTX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to FYHTX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYHTX dropped -33.22% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.