FYHTX vs. EAPCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FYHTX (Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund) and EAPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, FYHTX returned 9.78%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for EAPCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYHTX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for EAPCX.

Performance

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 21.68% return.

FYHTX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 20.66%
• 1Y: 31.28%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: —

EAPCX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 21.68%
• 6M: 24.42%
• 1Y: 41.33%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	20.27%	14.72%	4.73%	-8.62%	15.32%	26.43%	-3.84%	6.91%	-11.71%	6.00%
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	21.68%	22.06%	9.63%	-4.87%	17.26%	29.92%	7.77%	9.19%	-9.60%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FYHTX and EAPCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2017	0.90

The correlation between FYHTX and EAPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FYHTX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYHTX

FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

EAPCX

EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYHTX	EAPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	3.15	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.99	-0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.56	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	5.91	-1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	21.29	-9.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYHTX and EAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYHTX	EAPCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	3.15	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.97	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.30	+0.19

Drawdowns

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and EAPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYHTX	EAPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-52.59%	+19.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-7.22%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.52%	-10.57%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-18.05%	-7.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-4.44%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-22.77%	+10.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.00%	+0.76%

Volatility

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 4.15%. This indicates that FYHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYHTX	EAPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	4.15%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	11.72%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	13.92%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	14.64%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	13.26%	+1.22%

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYHTX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than EAPCX's 10.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	10.87%	13.23%	5.46%	3.43%	14.80%	13.74%	3.01%	1.11%	0.41%	4.98%	6.49%
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	2.44%	2.93%	3.78%	4.10%	57.34%	15.05%	0.00%	7.00%	12.49%	0.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYHTX and EAPCX in my portfolio?

FYHTX and EAPCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYHTX or EAPCX?

FYHTX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to EAPCX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYHTX dropped -33.22% vs EAPCX's -52.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.