EAPCX vs. FCSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX).
EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011. FCSSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 30, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAPCX or FCSSX.
Correlation
The correlation between EAPCX and FCSSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EAPCX:
1.10
FCSSX:
0.73
EAPCX:
1.59
FCSSX:
1.12
EAPCX:
1.19
FCSSX:
1.13
EAPCX:
0.80
FCSSX:
0.64
EAPCX:
2.74
FCSSX:
1.59
EAPCX:
4.48%
FCSSX:
5.37%
EAPCX:
11.22%
FCSSX:
11.70%
EAPCX:
-50.10%
FCSSX:
-66.66%
EAPCX:
-3.41%
FCSSX:
-2.82%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EAPCX having a 3.45% return and FCSSX slightly higher at 3.48%. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX has underperformed FCSSX with an annualized return of 5.51%, while FCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 75.65% annualized return.
EAPCX
3.45%
3.79%
8.78%
12.46%
13.48%
5.51%
FCSSX
3.48%
4.26%
9.29%
9.21%
99.67%
75.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAPCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAPCX vs. FCSSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EAPCX
FCSSX
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Dividend Comparison
EAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, less than FCSSX's 12.31% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 5.29% | 5.47% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 2.92% | 1.12% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.50% | 0.00% | 1.52% |
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.31% | 12.74% | 4.53% | 6,349.76% | 2,086.80% | 21.79% | 74.58% | 103.33% | 26.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAPCX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, smaller than the maximum FCSSX drawdown of -66.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPCX and FCSSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) is 3.05%, while Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that EAPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.