EAPCX vs. FCSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX).
EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011. FCSSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 30, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAPCX or FCSSX.
Key characteristics
| EAPCX | FCSSX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.75% | 3.96% |
| 1Y Return | 9.48% | 1.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.32% | 189.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.92% | 110.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.92% | 59.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 0.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.18 | 0.19 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.52 | 0.07 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.09 | 0.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.37% | 5.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.53% | 11.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.10% | -66.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.68% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAPCX and FCSSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EAPCX achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than FCSSX's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EAPCX has underperformed FCSSX with an annualized return of 3.92%, while FCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 59.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAPCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Dividend Comparison
EAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than FCSSX's 12.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 3.10% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 2.92% | 1.12% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.50% | 0.00% | 1.52% |
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.54% | 4.53% | 6,349.76% | 2,086.80% | 21.79% | 74.58% | 103.33% | 26.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAPCX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, smaller than the maximum FCSSX drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPCX and FCSSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAPCX vs. FCSSX - Volatility Comparison
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.