PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 25.16% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV's 19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 15.10%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%

TDIV

1D
-2.33%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
19.03%
6M
18.00%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
18.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
19.03%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and TDIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.73

The correlation between FYC and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYC vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
TDIV

Healthcare

25.3%

-

Industrials

18.7%
1.3%

Technology

17.5%
87.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Financial Services

8.9%

-

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
11.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Energy

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Healthcare

FYC
25.3%
TDIV

-

Industrials

FYC
18.7%
TDIV
1.3%

Technology

FYC
17.5%
TDIV
87.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.5%
TDIV

-

Financial Services

FYC
8.9%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

FYC
5.7%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FYC
3.7%
TDIV
11.6%

Basic Materials

FYC
3.7%
TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

FYC
3.2%
TDIV

-

Energy

FYC
2.2%
TDIV

-

Utilities

FYC
1.6%
TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

3.01

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.70

8.56

+11.15

FYC vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-31.97%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.35%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-23.00%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-31.97%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-31.97%

-15.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-10.47%

+9.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-4.85%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.98%

-1.09%

Volatility

FYC vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 7.00%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

10.50%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

15.69%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

20.02%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

20.97%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

20.96%

+3.65%

FYC vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than TDIV's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.22%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYC and TDIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to FYC (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.56% vs 15.10% for FYC. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.06% for FYC.

FYC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.50% for TDIV.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer