FYC vs. RZG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG).

FYC and RZG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FYC is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2011. RZG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both FYC and RZG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FYC vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FYC vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	2.07%	24.24%	23.99%	14.52%	-25.86%	21.64%	32.34%	16.79%	-5.54%	22.97%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	6.17%	10.22%	9.84%	19.15%	-29.00%	21.01%	17.76%	14.25%	-8.70%	19.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 6.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed RZG with an annualized return of 12.82%, while RZG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.

FYC

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -3.22%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 12.82%

RZG

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 6M: 6.39%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.

FYC

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

RZG

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF

Return for Risk

FYC vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC

FYC Risk / Return Rank: 86
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RZG

RZG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYC	RZG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.06	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.64	+0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.21	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	1.78	+1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.31	7.41	+4.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYC vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and RZG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYC	RZG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.06	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.11	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.36	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.35	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and RZG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FYC vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than RZG's 0.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.08%	0.08%	0.72%	0.58%	0.00%	0.63%	0.12%	0.39%	0.09%	0.10%	0.31%	0.21%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	0.46%	0.37%	0.95%	1.43%	1.59%	0.22%	0.49%	0.70%	0.46%	0.44%	0.65%	0.70%

Drawdowns

FYC vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and RZG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYC	RZG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.85%	-58.52%	+10.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.40%	-13.42%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.37%	-38.33%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.85%	-54.02%	+6.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	-3.61%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-12.22%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.22%	+0.25%

Volatility

FYC vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) at 8.32%. This indicates that FYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYC	RZG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.77%	8.32%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.40%	14.08%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.42%	22.71%	+1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.70%	23.08%	+0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.51%	24.61%	-0.10%