PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 26.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


FYC

1D
0.66%
1M
5.93%
YTD
26.11%
6M
22.06%
1Y
60.03%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
15.18%

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
26.11%24.24%23.99%6.77%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and IBIC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.00

The correlation between FYC and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.21

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.76

16.41

-10.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.86

58.11

-37.25

FYC vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-0.90%

-46.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-0.27%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-0.10%

-9.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

0.08%

+2.81%

Volatility

FYC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that FYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

0.16%

+6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

0.67%

+15.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

0.89%

+20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

1.57%

+22.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

1.57%

+23.07%

FYC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYC has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, FYC leads with 60.03% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FYC has performed better with a 60.03% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.06% for FYC.

FYC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer