PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYBTX vs. FCNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYBTX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FYBTX having a 2.57% annualized return and FCNVX not far ahead at 2.58%.


FYBTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
2.57%

FCNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
0.91%5.72%5.13%6.08%-3.50%-0.54%3.99%5.07%1.66%1.50%
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
1.50%4.51%5.43%5.86%0.85%-0.06%1.10%3.00%1.82%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FYBTX and FCNVX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYBTX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYBTX
FYBTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FYBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FYBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNVX
FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYBTXFCNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-19.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

14.09

-12.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

42.87

-39.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

146.17

-132.98

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYBTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYBTX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYBTXFCNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

3.60

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

2.79

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

2.48

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

2.20

-0.83

Drawdowns

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYBTX drawdown since its inception was -6.00%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYBTX and FCNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYBTXFCNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-2.19%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-0.10%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-0.30%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.00%

-0.59%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.00%

-2.19%

-3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-0.05%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.03%

+0.29%

Volatility

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) has a higher volatility of 0.53% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.33%. This indicates that FYBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYBTXFCNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.33%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

0.78%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

1.18%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

1.29%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.92%

1.04%

+0.88%

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYBTX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FYBTX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

FYBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FCNVX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.15%4.41%5.17%4.97%1.24%0.24%0.99%2.45%2.21%1.30%1.01%0.48%
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
4.73%4.66%3.67%2.76%1.26%1.65%2.31%2.72%2.45%1.59%1.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYBTX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYBTX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to FCNVX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYBTX dropped -6.00% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYBTX and FCNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer