FXY vs. XLG
FXY (Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXY is a Currency fund tracking the Japanese Yen, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXY returned -4.99%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for XLG. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. FXY charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
FXY vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXY achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FXY has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of -4.99%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.
FXY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.31%
- 5Y*
- -7.78%
- 10Y*
- -4.99%
XLG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.88%
FXY vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXY Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust | -3.36% | 0.09% | -10.93% | -7.44% | -12.75% | -10.90% | 4.61% | 0.37% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 1.11% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXY and XLG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2007 | -0.24 |
The correlation between FXY and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXY vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
FXY
XLG
FXY vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust (FXY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.23 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 1.45 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 5.15 | -6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXY vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXY drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXY and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.41% | -52.39% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -12.41% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | -20.70% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.30% | -28.02% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.36% | -30.46% | -10.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.41% | -7.36% | -49.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -7.63% | -20.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 3.50% | +4.04% |
Volatility
FXY vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust (FXY) is 0.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that FXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 5.03% | -4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 10.69% | -5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 13.95% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 18.79% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 18.87% | -9.64% |
FXY vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXY vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
FXY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXY Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXY and XLG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to FXY (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXY dropped -56.41% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.88% vs -4.99% for FXY. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FXY has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.88% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXY.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for FXY.
FXY is categorized as Currency, while XLG is S&P 500. FXY tracks Japanese Yen, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXY and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXY and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer