FXU vs. IYG
FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) and IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Utilities Index, while IYG is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXU returned 9.21%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for IYG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXU charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYG.
Performance
FXU vs. IYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's -6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FXU has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 9.21%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.
FXU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 13.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
IYG
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
FXU vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 6.16% | 21.86% | 22.50% | -2.12% | 3.68% | 17.67% | 1.53% | 11.67% | 5.43% | 0.98% |
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | -6.51% | 19.85% | 31.94% | 16.07% | -16.76% | 30.36% | 0.99% | 37.62% | -12.56% | 24.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXU and IYG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FXU and IYG has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FXU vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXU
IYG
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
FXU
IYG
-
Industrials
FXU
IYG
-
Energy
FXU
IYG
-
Basic Materials
FXU
-
IYG
-
Communication Services
FXU
-
IYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXU
-
IYG
-
Consumer Defensive
FXU
-
IYG
-
Financial Services
FXU
-
IYG
Healthcare
FXU
-
IYG
-
Real Estate
FXU
-
IYG
-
Technology
FXU
-
IYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXU vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank
FXU
IYG
FXU vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXU | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.36 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 0.93 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXU | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.37 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.39 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
FXU vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, smaller than the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and IYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXU | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.00% | -81.84% | +32.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -15.90% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -18.54% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -29.62% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.81% | -44.32% | +9.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -9.77% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -20.75% | +13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 6.09% | -3.02% |
Volatility
FXU vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) at 3.38%. This indicates that FXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXU | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.38% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 11.78% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 15.40% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 20.43% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 23.53% | -5.20% |
FXU vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXU vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison
FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than IYG's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.20% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.59% | 1.81% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXU and IYG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXU has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to IYG (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs IYG's -81.84%.
On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.37% vs 9.21% for FXU. On fees, IYG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.
FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.14% for IYG.
FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IYG is Financials Equities. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.42% for IYG.
FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXU and IYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer