PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXR vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXR vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 13.33%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


FXR

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.86%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.46%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
13.33%

TOLZ

1D
0.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
12.09%
6M
12.14%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXR vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
9.23%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.09%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and TOLZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FXR and TOLZ has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXR vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXR
TOLZ

Industrials

70.5%
5.1%

Technology

10.3%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.2%

-

Financial Services

3.4%
1.9%

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%
22.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

36.0%

Real Estate

-

7.9%

Industrials

FXR
70.5%
TOLZ
5.1%

Technology

FXR
10.3%
TOLZ
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXR
7.5%
TOLZ
0.8%

Basic Materials

FXR
6.2%
TOLZ

-

Financial Services

FXR
3.4%
TOLZ
1.9%

Healthcare

FXR
0.7%
TOLZ

-

Utilities

FXR
0.7%
TOLZ
22.2%

Communication Services

FXR

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

FXR

-

TOLZ
4.4%

Energy

FXR

-

TOLZ
36.0%

Real Estate

FXR

-

TOLZ
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXR vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXR vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXRTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.17

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

9.16

-4.46

FXR vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXR vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXRTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-39.33%

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-5.18%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-11.94%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-21.85%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-39.33%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-2.45%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-6.61%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

1.79%

+2.60%

Volatility

FXR vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that FXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXRTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

3.24%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

8.30%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

10.41%

+9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

13.98%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

16.23%

+5.68%

FXR vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXR vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.62%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.63%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXR and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXR has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, FXR leads with 13.33% vs 7.93% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXR has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.62% for FXR.

FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXR and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer