FXP vs. UPRO
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - FXP tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%) while UPRO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -23.04%/yr vs 30.09%/yr for UPRO. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
FXP vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -23.04%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.09% annualized return.
FXP
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- -30.22%
- 5Y*
- -16.52%
- 10Y*
- -23.04%
UPRO
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 26.67%
- 1Y
- 80.84%
- 3Y*
- 52.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 30.09%
FXP vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 13.64% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 27.90% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 102.30% | -25.11% | 71.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and UPRO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009 | -0.58 |
The correlation between FXP and UPRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.58 (all time) to -0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
UPRO
FXP vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXP | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.36 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 3.03 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 12.80 | -13.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXP | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 2.30 | -2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.46 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.42 | 0.56 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.65 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
FXP vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -76.82% | -23.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.21% | -26.78% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | -48.87% | -33.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | -63.94% | -23.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.71% | -76.82% | -17.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -2.09% | -97.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.15% | -14.42% | -79.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.66% | 6.33% | +11.33% |
Volatility
FXP vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 8.45%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.06% | 8.45% | +6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 26.60% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | 35.35% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.12% | 50.32% | +12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.91% | 53.74% | +1.17% |
FXP vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXP vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than UPRO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.12% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and UPRO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to UPRO (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.09% vs -23.04% for FXP. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.09% return vs -23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.68% for UPRO.
FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXP and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer