PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXP vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FXP vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FXP vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
11.77%-45.32%-52.46%12.74%-11.73%24.17%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-23.25%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -23.25% return.


FXP

1D
-5.19%
1M
7.12%
YTD
11.77%
6M
25.78%
1Y
-12.70%
3Y*
-27.68%
5Y*
-16.72%
10Y*
-23.48%

BITO

1D
1.75%
1M
2.92%
YTD
-23.25%
6M
-41.96%
1Y
-21.48%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FXP vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FXP and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

FXP vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXP vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXPBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.27

-0.48

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.07

-0.43

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.95

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.46

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.30

-0.97

+0.67

FXP vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXPBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

-0.48

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.08

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and BITO is -0.26. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FXP vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than BITO's 84.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
4.18%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
84.71%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FXP vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FXPBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-77.86%

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.42%

-50.05%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-47.07%

-52.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.10%

-36.56%

-57.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.47%

23.55%

+18.92%

Volatility

FXP vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.89%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FXPBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

12.89%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

36.69%

-7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.71%

45.35%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.04%

55.79%

+7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.96%

55.79%

-0.83%