FXN vs. GXPE
FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FXN tracks the StrataQuant Energy Index while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
FXN vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 25.36% return, which is significantly higher than GXPE's 22.46% return.
FXN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- 25.36%
- 6M
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 36.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
GXPE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 22.46%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXN vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 25.36% | 7.75% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 22.46% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXN and GXPE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXN vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
FXN
GXPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXN vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXN | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXN vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -14.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXN | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -14.89% | -72.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -13.07% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.90% | -3.62% | -34.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | — | — |
Volatility
FXN vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXN | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 20.69% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 20.69% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.94% | 20.69% | +14.25% |
FXN vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXN vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than GXPE's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.91% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.98% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FXN and GXPE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.98% for GXPE.
FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for FXN and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer