PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 39.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 21.15%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.75% annualized return.


FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%

XNTK

1D
-0.07%
1M
22.50%
YTD
39.32%
6M
37.26%
1Y
76.57%
3Y*
43.26%
5Y*
21.36%
10Y*
25.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
39.32%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and XNTK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.89

The correlation between FXL and XNTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
XNTK

Technology

88.1%
80.9%

Communication Services

5.9%
9.8%

Industrials

4.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
9.3%

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
88.1%
XNTK
80.9%

Communication Services

FXL
5.9%
XNTK
9.8%

Industrials

FXL
4.5%
XNTK

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
XNTK
9.3%

Financial Services

FXL
0.6%
XNTK

-

Basic Materials

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Energy

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Healthcare

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

FXL

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXLXNTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

4.53

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

15.08

-3.14

FXL vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXLXNTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

3.31

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.77

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.97

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.45

+0.11

Drawdowns

FXL vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-72.38%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-17.00%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-28.11%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-48.28%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-48.28%

+9.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.07%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-21.30%

+9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

5.09%

-1.06%

Volatility

FXL vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

7.52%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

18.05%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

23.29%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

27.90%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

26.64%

-1.36%

FXL vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FXL and XNTK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to XNTK (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.75% vs 21.15% for FXL. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.75% return vs 21.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer