FXL vs. XNTK
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FXL tracks the StrataQuant Technology Index while XNTK tracks the NYSE Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXL returned 20.80%/yr vs 25.67%/yr for XNTK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNTK.
Performance
FXL vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 32.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 20.80%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.67% annualized return.
FXL
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 23.89%
- 6M
- 21.72%
- 1Y
- 37.39%
- 3Y*
- 23.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
XNTK
- 1D
- -5.42%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 32.72%
- 6M
- 30.83%
- 1Y
- 62.72%
- 3Y*
- 39.51%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- 25.67%
FXL vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 23.89% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 54.20% | 38.66% | 2.72% | 35.82% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 32.72% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and XNTK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FXL and XNTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXL vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
XNTK
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FXL
XNTK
Communication Services
FXL
XNTK
Industrials
FXL
XNTK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
XNTK
Financial Services
FXL
XNTK
-
Basic Materials
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Energy
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Healthcare
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Real Estate
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Utilities
FXL
-
XNTK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
XNTK
FXL vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXL | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.71 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 12.03 | -3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXL vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and XNTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -72.38% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -17.00% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -28.11% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -48.28% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | -48.28% | +9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -5.42% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -21.26% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 5.23% | -0.97% |
Volatility
FXL vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 12.05%, while State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 14.84%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 14.84% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 22.07% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.24% | 26.71% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 28.52% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 26.92% | -1.49% |
FXL vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FXL and XNTK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XNTK has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to FXL (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs XNTK's -72.38%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.67% vs 20.80% for FXL. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.67% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.35% for XNTK.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and XNTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer