FXL vs. TRUT
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FXL is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
FXL vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXL vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 8.02% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and TRUT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
TRUT
FXL vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 2.39 | -1.83 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -18.55% | -42.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.46% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -5.17% | -6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility
FXL vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 21.53% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 21.53% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 21.53% | +3.75% |
FXL vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and TRUT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for FXL and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer