FXL vs. SPMO
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXL returned 21.15%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FXL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXL having a 21.15% annualized return and SPMO not far behind at 20.95%.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FXL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 54.20% | 38.66% | 2.72% | 35.82% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and SPMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FXL and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXL vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FXL
SPMO
Communication Services
FXL
SPMO
Industrials
FXL
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
SPMO
Financial Services
FXL
SPMO
Basic Materials
FXL
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
SPMO
Energy
FXL
-
SPMO
Healthcare
FXL
-
SPMO
Real Estate
FXL
-
SPMO
Utilities
FXL
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
SPMO
FXL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.64 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 14.17 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.62 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.27 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 1.03 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.01 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -30.95% | -30.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -12.70% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -20.13% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -22.74% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | -30.95% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | 0.00% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -4.60% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 3.26% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FXL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 7.35% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 14.39% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 17.64% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 19.30% | +5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 20.31% | +4.97% |
FXL vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 21.15% vs 20.95% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 20.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer