PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 14.22% return.


FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%-3.48%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and ROBT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.89

The correlation between FXL and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
ROBT

Technology

88.1%
57.0%

Communication Services

5.9%
4.1%

Industrials

4.5%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
6.6%

Financial Services

0.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
88.1%
ROBT
57.0%

Communication Services

FXL
5.9%
ROBT
4.1%

Industrials

FXL
4.5%
ROBT
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
ROBT
6.6%

Financial Services

FXL
0.6%
ROBT
1.6%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

ROBT

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

ROBT
1.4%

Energy

FXL

-

ROBT
1.5%

Healthcare

FXL

-

ROBT
7.4%

Real Estate

FXL

-

ROBT

-

Utilities

FXL

-

ROBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXLROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.42

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

4.09

+7.86

FXL vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXLROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.32

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.09

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.35

+0.21

Drawdowns

FXL vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-44.47%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-21.66%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-27.68%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-43.26%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.73%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-15.97%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

7.53%

-3.50%

Volatility

FXL vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 6.46%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

6.46%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

17.51%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

23.32%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

25.18%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

25.48%

-0.20%

FXL vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXL nor ROBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and ROBT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to ROBT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 5-year performance, FXL leads with 13.48% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, FXL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXL has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

FXL and ROBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.65% for ROBT.

FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer