PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 45.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 20.80%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.39% annualized return.


FXL

1D
-3.19%
1M
3.12%
YTD
23.89%
6M
21.72%
1Y
37.39%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
20.80%

IDGT

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
45.86%
6M
44.45%
1Y
53.87%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
23.89%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
45.86%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and IDGT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.80

The correlation between FXL and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
IDGT

Technology

88.5%
56.9%

Communication Services

4.8%
6.7%

Industrials

3.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
88.5%
IDGT
56.9%

Communication Services

FXL
4.8%
IDGT
6.7%

Industrials

FXL
3.8%
IDGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
IDGT

-

Financial Services

FXL
1.0%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

FXL

-

IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

IDGT

-

Energy

FXL

-

IDGT

-

Healthcare

FXL

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

IDGT
35.5%

Utilities

FXL

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

6.00

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

17.17

-8.38

FXL vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-77.95%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-9.02%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-23.74%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-35.83%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-36.88%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-6.71%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-19.88%

+8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

3.15%

+1.11%

Volatility

FXL vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 9.03%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

9.03%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

17.61%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.24%

21.41%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.48%

23.35%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

23.32%

+2.11%

FXL vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.74%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and IDGT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to IDGT (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 20.80% vs 14.39% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer