FXI vs. PM
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PM. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FXI vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 15.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 3.13%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -1.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
PM
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
FXI vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 15.93% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and PM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FXI and PM has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
PM
FXI vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.05 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.18 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 0.34 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -42.87% | -29.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -20.64% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -20.64% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -22.78% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -42.87% | -17.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -3.94% | -23.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -10.02% | -21.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 10.81% | -3.15% |
Volatility
FXI vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.22%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 7.76% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 21.07% | -6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 27.73% | -7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 22.73% | +8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 24.46% | +3.18% |
Dividends
FXI vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than PM's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.13% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and PM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs PM's -42.87%.
PM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer