FXI vs. ICLN
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for ICLN. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.
Performance
FXI vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 3.13%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.01%
- 1Y
- 60.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
FXI vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 27.33% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and ICLN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FXI and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXI vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
ICLN
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Financial Services
FXI
ICLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
ICLN
Communication Services
FXI
ICLN
-
Technology
FXI
ICLN
Energy
FXI
ICLN
Industrials
FXI
ICLN
Basic Materials
FXI
ICLN
Healthcare
FXI
ICLN
-
Real Estate
FXI
ICLN
-
Consumer Defensive
FXI
ICLN
-
Utilities
FXI
ICLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
ICLN
FXI vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.34 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 3.73 | -3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 13.84 | -14.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -87.15% | +14.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -16.38% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -43.18% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -57.16% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -66.75% | +5.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -43.03% | +15.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -66.56% | +35.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 4.41% | +3.25% |
Volatility
FXI vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.22%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 12.97% | -6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 22.62% | -8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 28.21% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 27.55% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 27.32% | +0.32% |
FXI vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than ICLN's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and ICLN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICLN has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs ICLN's -87.15%.
On 10-year performance, ICLN leads with 11.67% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ICLN has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.28% for ICLN.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.39% for ICLN.
ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer