FXI vs. EWO
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for EWO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWO.
Performance
FXI vs. EWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 18.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 3.13%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
EWO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 23.71%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 33.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
FXI vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 18.55% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and EWO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2004 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FXI and EWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXI vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
EWO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Financial Services
FXI
EWO
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
EWO
Communication Services
FXI
EWO
-
Technology
FXI
EWO
Energy
FXI
EWO
Industrials
FXI
EWO
Basic Materials
FXI
EWO
Healthcare
FXI
EWO
-
Real Estate
FXI
EWO
Consumer Defensive
FXI
EWO
-
Utilities
FXI
EWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
EWO
FXI vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 3.28 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 11.10 | -11.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and EWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -75.69% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -14.08% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -16.75% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -41.82% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -58.10% | -2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | 0.00% | -27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -28.10% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 4.16% | +3.50% |
Volatility
FXI vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.22%, while iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 7.31% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 15.88% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 19.19% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 21.95% | +9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 22.88% | +4.76% |
FXI vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than EWO's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.01% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and EWO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs EWO's -75.69%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 15.10% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.01% for EWO.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while EWO is Europe Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.49% for EWO.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and EWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer