PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. XPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. XPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXH having a 0.68% return and XPH slightly lower at 0.66%. Over the past 10 years, FXH has outperformed XPH with an annualized return of 7.03%, while XPH has yielded a comparatively lower 3.44% annualized return.


FXH

1D
1.48%
1M
1.65%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
7.03%

XPH

1D
1.10%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
0.66%
6M
4.44%
1Y
37.98%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. XPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.68%10.16%0.96%-4.53%-12.24%15.20%28.00%22.26%-1.33%21.82%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.66%31.60%4.94%2.97%-9.83%-10.54%14.68%25.61%-15.32%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and XPH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.77

The correlation between FXH and XPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXH vs. XPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
XPH

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FXH
100.0%
XPH
100.0%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

XPH

-

Communication Services

FXH

-

XPH

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

XPH

-

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

XPH

-

Energy

FXH

-

XPH

-

Financial Services

FXH

-

XPH

-

Industrials

FXH

-

XPH

-

Real Estate

FXH

-

XPH

-

Technology

FXH

-

XPH

-

Utilities

FXH

-

XPH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. XPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. XPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXHXPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

3.19

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

11.37

-8.04

FXH vs. XPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the XPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and XPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXHXPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.77

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.17

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.16

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

FXH vs. XPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum XPH drawdown of -48.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and XPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHXPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-48.03%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-11.97%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-23.57%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-31.63%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-35.97%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-7.22%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-17.25%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.35%

+0.64%

Volatility

FXH vs. XPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is 4.16%, while SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that FXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHXPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

7.03%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

16.77%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

21.52%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

20.84%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

22.10%

-3.63%

FXH vs. XPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XPH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. XPH - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than XPH's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.85%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.66%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXH and XPH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to FXH (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs XPH's -48.03%.

On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.03% vs 3.44% for XPH. On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.

FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.66% for XPH.

FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.35% for XPH.

XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and XPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer