FXG vs. YCS
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXG returned 4.22%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for YCS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FXG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FXG has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 4.22%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
FXG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 23.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
FXG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | -0.24% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 21.73% | 4.85% | 20.65% | -11.49% | 7.87% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 6.99% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and YCS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.12 |
The correlation between FXG and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
YCS
FXG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 2.05 | -2.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | 2.59 | -2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.37 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 3.95 | -4.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 12.35 | -12.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.05 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.10 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.65 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.33 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FXG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -49.56% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -8.30% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -23.05% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | -27.32% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | -27.32% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.75% | -0.04% | -12.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -19.94% | +13.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 2.66% | +2.69% |
Volatility
FXG vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that FXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 2.75% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 12.36% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 17.38% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 21.11% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 19.02% | -4.09% |
FXG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.90% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and YCS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXG has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.32% vs 4.22% for FXG. On fees, FXG is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXG is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer