FXG vs. NVII
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and NVII (REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. FXG is passively managed, while NVII is actively managed. Over the past year, FXG returned -2.62% vs 72.46% for NVII. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVII.
Performance
FXG vs. NVII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 19.51% return.
FXG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
NVII
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 19.51%
- 6M
- 21.86%
- 1Y
- 72.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXG vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | -0.24% | -2.09% |
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF | 19.51% | 48.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and NVII is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
NVII
FXG vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXG | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 2.13 | -2.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | 2.64 | -2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 4.10 | -4.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 10.49 | -11.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXG | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.13 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 2.22 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
FXG vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and NVII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -18.47% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -18.47% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.75% | -5.37% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -5.48% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 7.22% | -1.87% |
Volatility
FXG vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 3.26%, while REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 11.60% | -8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 25.05% | -15.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 34.25% | -21.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 34.42% | -20.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 34.42% | -19.49% |
FXG vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than NVII's 49.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.90% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF | 49.82% | 29.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and NVII have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVII has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to FXG (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs NVII's -18.47%.
On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 72.46% vs -2.62% for FXG. On fees, FXG is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 72.46% return vs -2.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXG is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.
NVII has the higher dividend yield at 49.82%, compared with 2.90% for FXG.
FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.99% for NVII.
NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and NVII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer