PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXG vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXG vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 19.51% return.


FXG

1D
-0.22%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
0.91%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
4.22%

NVII

1D
-0.56%
1M
9.94%
YTD
19.51%
6M
21.86%
1Y
72.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXG vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXG and NVII is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXG vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXG vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXGNVIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

2.13

-2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

2.64

-2.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.33

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

4.10

-4.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.57

10.49

-11.06

FXG vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXG and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXGNVIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

2.13

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

2.22

-1.75

Drawdowns

FXG vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXGNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-18.47%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-18.47%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-5.37%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-5.48%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

7.22%

-1.87%

Volatility

FXG vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 3.26%, while REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXGNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

11.60%

-8.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

25.05%

-15.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

34.25%

-21.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

34.42%

-20.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

34.42%

-19.49%

FXG vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXG vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than NVII's 49.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
49.82%29.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXG and NVII have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to FXG (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs NVII's -18.47%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 72.46% vs -2.62% for FXG. On fees, FXG is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 72.46% return vs -2.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXG is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 49.82%, compared with 2.90% for FXG.

FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.99% for NVII.

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXG and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer