FXF vs. RSP
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.25%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
FXF vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 1.25%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
FXF vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.20% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and RSP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2006 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, FXF and RSP have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
RSP
FXF vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXF | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.49 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 9.48 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXF | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.70 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.65 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.57 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
FXF vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -59.92% | +24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.82% | -7.85% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -17.81% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.03% | -21.38% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -39.04% | +24.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.53% | -0.38% | -18.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -6.65% | -14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.06% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FXF vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.69%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 2.56% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 8.29% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.51% | 11.56% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 16.18% | -7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 18.35% | -10.78% |
FXF vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and RSP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to FXF (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 1.25% for FXF. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while RSP is S&P 500. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer