FXD vs. TDIV
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXD returned 8.08%/yr vs 17.01%/yr for TDIV. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
FXD vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 14.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 8.08%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.
FXD
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.56%
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.22M | $850.69K | $681.18K | |
| $13.49M | $14.96M | $15.07M |
FXD vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 2.67% | 6.70% | 10.57% | 23.39% | -21.56% | 22.72% | 12.97% | 24.22% | -11.60% | 19.77% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 14.88% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and TDIV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FXD and TDIV has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FXD vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXD
TDIV
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXD
TDIV
-
Industrials
FXD
TDIV
Communication Services
FXD
TDIV
Consumer Defensive
FXD
TDIV
-
Technology
FXD
TDIV
Energy
FXD
TDIV
-
Basic Materials
FXD
-
TDIV
-
Financial Services
FXD
-
TDIV
-
Healthcare
FXD
-
TDIV
-
Real Estate
FXD
-
TDIV
-
Utilities
FXD
-
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
TDIV
FXD vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.47 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 4.06 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXD vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -31.97% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -16.34% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -23.00% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -31.97% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -31.97% | -17.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -13.59% | +10.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.91% | -4.92% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 5.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FXD vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) have volatilities of 5.98% and 5.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.94% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 16.32% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 20.70% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 21.11% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 20.99% | +2.73% |
FXD vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than TDIV's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and TDIV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXD has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to TDIV (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 17.01% vs 8.08% for FXD. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 17.01% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.60% for FXD.
FXD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.50% for TDIV.
TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXD and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer