FXD vs. RSPD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXD returned 7.89%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for RSPD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.

Performance

FXD vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than RSPD's -4.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXD having a 7.89% annualized return and RSPD not far ahead at 7.97%.

FXD

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: -1.88%
• 6M: -1.26%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 3.00%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

RSPD

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: -4.30%
• 6M: -3.84%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 7.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund	-1.88%	6.70%	10.57%	23.39%	-21.56%	22.72%	12.97%	24.22%	-11.60%	19.77%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-4.30%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	28.75%	11.43%	25.88%	-8.79%	15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and RSPD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.89

The correlation between FXD and RSPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXD vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXD	RSPD
Consumer Cyclical	69.7%	93.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	-
Industrials	9.2%	1.9%
Communication Services	6.7%	2.0%
Technology	2.5%	2.2%
Energy	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXD vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD

FXD Risk / Return Rank: 16
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 13
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXD	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.29	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.58	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.06	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	0.38	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.65	0.96	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXD vs. RSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the RSPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and RSPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXD	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.29	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.14	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.35	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.33	-0.02

Drawdowns

FXD vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and RSPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXD	RSPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.27%	-68.00%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.94%	-13.80%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.02%	-21.01%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.74%	-34.41%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.54%	-48.00%	-1.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.12%	-9.07%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.97%	-10.70%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.48%	5.52%	-0.04%

Volatility

FXD vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) at 5.33%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXD	RSPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	5.33%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	13.45%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.21%	18.27%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.70%	22.10%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.67%	23.11%	+0.56%

FXD vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXD vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than RSPD's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund	0.78%	0.80%	0.89%	0.70%	1.00%	0.62%	0.42%	0.92%	1.08%	0.93%	1.05%	0.90%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.03%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXD and RSPD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FXD and RSPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FXD or RSPD?

FXD has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to RSPD (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs RSPD's -68.00%.

Which ETF is better, FXD or RSPD?

On 10-year performance, RSPD leads with 7.97% vs 7.89% for FXD. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXD or RSPD?

Over the 10-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXD or RSPD?

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXD or RSPD?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.78% for FXD.

What is the main difference between FXD and RSPD?

FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.40% for RSPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.