PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. IBUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. IBUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than IBUY's -10.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed IBUY with an annualized return of 7.89%, while IBUY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.


FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%

IBUY

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-10.92%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
-2.54%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
-11.36%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. IBUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
-1.88%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
-10.92%15.26%20.14%38.01%-55.71%-22.99%123.79%28.47%-1.93%50.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and IBUY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.77

The correlation between FXD and IBUY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXD vs. IBUY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
IBUY

Consumer Cyclical

69.7%
71.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
2.5%

Industrials

9.2%
5.1%

Communication Services

6.7%
5.8%

Technology

2.5%
5.1%

Energy

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
69.7%
IBUY
71.7%

Consumer Defensive

FXD
9.2%
IBUY
2.5%

Industrials

FXD
9.2%
IBUY
5.1%

Communication Services

FXD
6.7%
IBUY
5.8%

Technology

FXD
2.5%
IBUY
5.1%

Energy

FXD
0.8%
IBUY

-

Basic Materials

FXD

-

IBUY

-

Financial Services

FXD

-

IBUY
4.2%

Healthcare

FXD

-

IBUY
4.7%

Real Estate

FXD

-

IBUY
0.8%

Utilities

FXD

-

IBUY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. IBUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IBUY
IBUY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IBUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBUY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBUY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. IBUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXDIBUYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

-0.12

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

-0.02

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.00

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

-0.11

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.65

-0.24

+1.89

FXD vs. IBUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the IBUY Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and IBUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXDIBUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

-0.12

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.36

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Drawdowns

FXD vs. IBUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, smaller than the maximum IBUY drawdown of -73.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and IBUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDIBUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-73.00%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-23.23%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-28.87%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-71.15%

+37.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-73.00%

+23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-52.29%

+45.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-29.65%

+18.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

10.50%

-5.02%

Volatility

FXD vs. IBUY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) at 5.60%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDIBUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

5.60%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

15.70%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

21.51%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

32.07%

-9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

29.16%

-5.49%

FXD vs. IBUY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than IBUY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. IBUY - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than IBUY's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
0.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.54%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and IBUY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXD has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs IBUY's -73.00%.

On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 10.38% vs 7.89% for FXD. On fees, FXD is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXD is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.

FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.65% for IBUY.

FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and IBUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer