FXD vs. GXPD
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
FXD vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -4.42% return.
FXD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXD vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.06% | 3.53% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -4.42% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and GXPD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXD vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXD vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -16.61% | -48.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -8.86% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -4.40% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | — | — |
Volatility
FXD vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 20.38% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 20.38% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 20.38% | +3.31% |
FXD vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than GXPD's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and GXPD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.20% for GXPD.
FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for FXD and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer