FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS
FXC.AS (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXC.AS is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FXC.AS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FXC.AS is traded in EUR, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
FXC.AS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -6.20% | 14.11% | 39.71% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXC.AS and DFND.AS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
FXC.AS
DFND.AS
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXC.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXC.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXC.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.10% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.51% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.09% | — | — |
Volatility
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXC.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.17% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | — | — |
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while DFND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 2.24% | 2.07% | 2.48% | 2.68% | 2.53% | 2.10% | 2.93% | 2.74% | 3.48% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXC.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXC.AS.
FXC.AS is categorized as China Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. FXC.AS tracks MSCI China NR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXC.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for FXC.AS and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer