PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FXC.AS is traded in EUR, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


FXC.AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-6.20%
6M
-8.22%
1Y
-1.13%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
3.01%

DFND.AS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF
-6.20%14.11%39.71%
DFND.AS
iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%19.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FXC.AS and DFND.AS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXC.AS
FXC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND.AS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXC.ASDFND.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXC.ASDFND.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

Drawdowns

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXC.ASDFND.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.09%

Volatility

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXC.ASDFND.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.05%

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXC.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while DFND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFND.AS
iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF
2.24%2.07%2.48%2.68%2.53%2.10%2.93%2.74%3.48%2.83%2.62%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXC.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXC.AS.

FXC.AS is categorized as China Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. FXC.AS tracks MSCI China NR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXC.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXC.AS and DFND.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer