FXC.AS vs. AMDWX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXC.AS (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and AMDWX (Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund) are both funds - FXC.AS is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while AMDWX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Amana. Over the past 10 years, FXC.AS returned 2.88%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for AMDWX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXC.AS charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for AMDWX.

Performance

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FXC.AS is traded in EUR, while AMDWX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMDWX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXC.AS achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly lower than AMDWX's 28.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC.AS has underperformed AMDWX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while AMDWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.26% annualized return.

FXC.AS

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: -7.23%
• 1Y: 0.25%
• 3Y*: 8.84%
• 5Y*: -2.15%
• 10Y*: 2.88%

AMDWX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 7.45%
• YTD: 28.77%
• 6M: 30.74%
• 1Y: 50.75%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	-5.88%	13.80%	38.37%	-15.83%	-16.25%	-13.60%	0.80%	15.49%	-7.49%	18.82%
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund	28.77%	5.73%	13.99%	9.85%	-12.50%	15.34%	11.27%	21.36%	-11.59%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FXC.AS and AMDWX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2009	0.48

The correlation between FXC.AS and AMDWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXC.AS

FXC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9
FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FXC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FXC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FXC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FXC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

AMDWX

AMDWX Risk / Return Rank: 89
AMDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AMDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AMDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AMDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AMDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXC.AS	AMDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	3.21	-3.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	4.22	-4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.58	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	5.70	-5.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.03	21.39	-21.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the AMDWX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXC.AS and AMDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXC.AS	AMDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	3.21	-3.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.73	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.58	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.47	-0.26

Drawdowns

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXC.AS drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than AMDWX's maximum drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC.AS and AMDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXC.AS	AMDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.87%	-25.28%	-41.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-9.01%	-6.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.79%	-18.54%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.50%	-18.54%	-28.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.92%	-25.02%	-28.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.62%	-0.43%	-23.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	-8.09%	-18.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.08%	2.40%	+4.68%

Volatility

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) at 6.75%. This indicates that FXC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXC.AS	AMDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	6.75%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	13.26%	-0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	16.03%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.17%	13.57%	+14.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.06%	14.17%	+10.89%

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDWX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Dividend Comparison

FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than AMDWX's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund	2.21%	2.80%	0.58%	0.91%	1.03%	1.16%	0.00%	0.37%	0.50%	0.18%	0.28%	0.58%
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	1.91%	1.79%	2.26%	2.51%	2.52%	1.79%	2.49%	2.47%	2.99%	2.39%	2.34%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXC.AS and AMDWX in my portfolio?

FXC.AS and AMDWX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.