PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FXC.AS vs. AMDWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX).

FXC.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. AMDWX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 27, 2009.

Performance

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF		-5.85%14.11%38.75%-15.70%-16.24%-13.34%1.28%15.82%-7.05%19.38%
AMDWX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund		8.79%5.73%13.99%9.85%-12.50%15.34%11.27%21.36%-11.59%6.48%
Different Trading Currencies

FXC.AS is traded in EUR, while AMDWX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMDWX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXC.AS achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly lower than AMDWX's 8.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC.AS has underperformed AMDWX with an annualized return of 3.25%, while AMDWX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.63% annualized return.

FXC.AS

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-5.85%
6M
-11.66%
1Y
-4.98%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*
3.25%

AMDWX

1D
1.95%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
8.79%
6M
16.20%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund

Often compared with FXC.AS:
FXC.AS vs. HMCD.LFXC.AS vs. MCHIFXC.AS vs. EMIM.LFXC.AS vs. IWDA.LFXC.AS vs. IWDA.ASFXC.AS vs. CQQQFXC.AS vs. TDIV.AS
Often compared with AMDWX:
AMDWX vs. AMAGXAMDWX vs. UMMAAMDWX vs. ^SP500TRAMDWX vs. SPUSAMDWX vs. FDFIXAMDWX vs. VXUSAMDWX vs. HLAL

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDWX's 1.14% expense ratio.

AMDWX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FXC.AS
FXC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
AMDWX
AMDWX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FXC.ASAMDWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

1.54

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.17

2.09

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.29

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.87

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.32

8.85

-7.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the AMDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXC.AS and AMDWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FXC.ASAMDWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.54

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.47

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.48

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.39

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FXC.AS and AMDWX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Dividend Comparison

FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than AMDWX's 2.62% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF		2.23%2.07%2.48%2.68%2.53%2.10%2.93%2.74%3.48%2.83%2.62%2.94%
AMDWX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund		2.62%2.80%0.58%0.91%1.03%1.16%0.00%0.37%0.50%0.18%0.28%0.58%

Drawdowns

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXC.AS drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, which is greater than AMDWX's maximum drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC.AS and AMDWX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FXC.ASAMDWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-28.88%

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-11.36%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-27.01%

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.70%

-27.42%

-26.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.81%

-8.89%

-13.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-9.07%

-16.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

2.85%

+2.40%

Volatility

FXC.AS vs. AMDWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) is 5.32%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that FXC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FXC.ASAMDWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

7.15%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

12.07%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

16.83%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

13.13%

+14.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

13.97%

+11.13%