FXC.AS vs. CQQQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).

FXC.AS and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXC.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both FXC.AS and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	-5.85%	14.11%	38.75%	-15.70%	-16.24%	-13.34%	1.28%	15.82%	-7.05%	19.38%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-10.41%	18.95%	17.09%	-19.21%	-25.76%	-18.89%	44.37%	36.58%	-31.71%	52.89%

Different Trading Currencies

FXC.AS is traded in EUR, while CQQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CQQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXC.AS achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's -10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC.AS has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 3.25%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.

FXC.AS

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: -5.85%
• 6M: -11.66%
• 1Y: -4.98%
• 3Y*: 6.93%
• 5Y*: -2.96%
• 10Y*: 3.25%

CQQQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.90%
• YTD: -10.10%
• 6M: -20.07%
• 1Y: -1.13%
• 3Y*: -1.54%
• 5Y*: -10.40%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

FXC.AS

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

CQQQ

Invesco China Technology ETF

Return for Risk

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXC.AS

FXC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 13
FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FXC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FXC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FXC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FXC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 17
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXC.AS	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.04	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	0.18	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.02	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	-0.03	+0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	-0.07	+1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXC.AS and CQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXC.AS	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	-0.04	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	-0.29	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.11	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.21	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FXC.AS and CQQQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than CQQQ's 2.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXC.AS iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	2.23%	2.07%	2.48%	2.68%	2.53%	2.10%	2.93%	2.74%	3.48%	2.83%	2.62%	2.94%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.45%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%

Drawdowns

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXC.AS drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -70.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC.AS and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXC.AS	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.56%	-73.99%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-24.41%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.37%	-67.04%	+18.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.70%	-73.99%	+20.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.81%	-56.24%	+33.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-28.05%	+2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	9.10%	-3.85%

Volatility

FXC.AS vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) is 5.32%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that FXC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXC.AS	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	9.08%	-3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	20.63%	-7.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	31.91%	-10.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.11%	36.25%	-8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.10%	32.37%	-7.27%