PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXAIX vs. CGMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXAIX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.39% return.


FXAIX

1D
1.76%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
15.44%

CGMU

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
8.59%17.84%25.01%26.29%0.58%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
1.39%5.19%2.64%6.76%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FXAIX and CGMU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXAIX vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMU
CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXAIXCGMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.59

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.49

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

7.97

+4.48

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXAIX and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXAIX drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXAIX and CGMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAIXCGMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-4.11%

-29.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-2.55%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-3.89%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-0.89%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-0.84%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.79%

+1.16%

Volatility

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.81%. This indicates that FXAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAIXCGMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

0.81%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

1.73%

+7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

2.28%

+10.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

3.47%

+13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

3.47%

+14.63%

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXAIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXAIX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CGMU's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.33%3.32%3.21%3.08%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXAIX and CGMU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to CGMU (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXAIX dropped -33.79% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXAIX and CGMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer