FWTKX vs. LTSTX
FWTKX (Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K6) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FWTKX returned 8.52%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for LTSTX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FWTKX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.
Performance
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWTKX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 5.01% return.
FWTKX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
LTSTX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWTKX Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K6 | 9.67% | 19.56% | 14.42% | 18.06% | -17.52% | 14.65% | 17.49% | 24.74% | -8.13% | 8.25% |
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | 5.01% | 12.16% | 11.91% | 13.30% | -15.23% | 10.91% | 13.70% | 20.50% | -6.41% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWTKX and LTSTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FWTKX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWTKX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank
FWTKX
LTSTX
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K6 (FWTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWTKX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.11 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 3.05 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.68 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 12.12 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWTKX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.11 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWTKX drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWTKX and LTSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWTKX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -48.17% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -5.24% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.56% | -8.12% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -21.01% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -6.16% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.16% | +0.55% |
Volatility
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K6 (FWTKX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.03%. This indicates that FWTKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWTKX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 2.03% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 5.39% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68% | 6.65% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 9.18% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 9.83% | +4.09% |
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWTKX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FWTKX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison
FWTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than LTSTX's 11.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWTKX Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K6 | 6.17% | 5.33% | 5.97% | 2.20% | 11.54% | 11.87% | 6.18% | 7.06% | 8.15% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | 11.61% | 12.19% | 9.74% | 4.26% | 8.00% | 7.66% | 5.25% | 6.91% | 6.39% | 4.75% | 3.65% | 8.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FWTKX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FWTKX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to LTSTX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWTKX dropped -28.78% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.
FWTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FWTKX and LTSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer