FWRLX vs. PRMTX
FWRLX (Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio) and PRMTX (T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund) are both Communications Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX returned 14.51%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for PRMTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.77% expense ratio.
Performance
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a 31.38% return, which is significantly higher than PRMTX's -1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has underperformed PRMTX with an annualized return of 14.51%, while PRMTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.30% annualized return.
FWRLX
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 31.38%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 29.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
PRMTX
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 31.38% | 2.20% | 17.12% | 25.97% | -27.86% | 12.15% | 33.39% | 40.17% | -6.37% | 24.87% |
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | -1.65% | 6.86% | 48.75% | 39.30% | -40.90% | 9.81% | 53.69% | 35.69% | -1.85% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRLX and PRMTX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2000 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FWRLX and PRMTX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRLX vs. PRMTX — Risk / Return Rank
FWRLX
PRMTX
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWRLX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.99 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.13 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.26 | -0.30 | +10.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, which is greater than PRMTX's maximum drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and PRMTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRLX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.37% | -66.30% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -17.29% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -20.69% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -47.17% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.01% | -47.17% | +15.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -9.41% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.37% | -13.94% | -6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 7.41% | -4.29% |
Volatility
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) at 6.83%. This indicates that FWRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRLX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.16% | 6.83% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 12.45% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 15.71% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 21.69% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 20.94% | -2.45% |
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FWRLX and PRMTX have an expense ratio of 0.77%.
Dividends
FWRLX vs. PRMTX - Dividend Comparison
FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than PRMTX's 25.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 1.33% | 6.59% | 9.06% | 2.38% | 9.26% | 7.53% | 6.95% | 2.74% | 16.03% | 3.57% | 6.57% | 7.21% |
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | 25.65% | 25.23% | 14.78% | 7.74% | 17.50% | 8.35% | 5.29% | 2.45% | 1.28% | 2.35% | 2.24% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWRLX and PRMTX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWRLX has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to PRMTX (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWRLX dropped -79.37% vs PRMTX's -66.30%.
FWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FWRLX and PRMTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer