PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMTX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMTX achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMTX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 13.94%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.34% annualized return.


PRMTX

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.00%
6M
-4.16%
YTD
-5.92%
1Y
-6.58%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
13.94%
ALL TIME*
14.50%

PRGTX

1D
5.19%
1M
-5.99%
6M
20.57%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
30.64%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
17.34%
ALL TIME*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMTX
T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund
-5.92%6.86%48.75%39.30%-40.90%9.81%53.69%35.69%-1.85%33.00%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
23.62%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMTX and PRGTX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.88

The correlation between PRMTX and PRGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMTX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRMTX
PRMTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PRMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMTXPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.23

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

1.99

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

6.74

-7.65

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMTX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMTX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMTX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMTXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.30%

-71.18%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.29%

-18.50%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.69%

-26.67%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.17%

-65.29%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.17%

-65.29%

+18.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.34%

-14.26%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-21.45%

+7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.03%

5.45%

+2.58%

Volatility

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) is 5.73%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that PRMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMTXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

11.71%

-5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

25.46%

-12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

29.02%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.79%

32.66%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

28.83%

-7.84%

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMTX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMTX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

PRMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.81%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
PRMTX
T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund
26.81%25.23%14.78%7.74%17.50%8.35%5.29%2.45%1.28%2.35%2.24%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRMTX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGTX has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to PRMTX (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMTX dropped -66.30% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMTX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer