FWIFX vs. CAEIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FWIFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I) and CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX returned 16.04%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for CAEIX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWIFX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CAEIX.

Performance

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWIFX achieves a 24.16% return, which is significantly higher than CAEIX's 18.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 16.04%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.29% annualized return.

FWIFX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 24.16%
• 6M: 23.14%
• 1Y: 42.59%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 16.04%

CAEIX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 18.53%
• 6M: 17.68%
• 1Y: 41.58%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 12.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	24.16%	16.11%	27.63%	24.92%	-25.72%	18.43%	30.92%	28.94%	-4.56%	29.58%
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	18.53%	32.61%	-7.13%	5.67%	-17.43%	6.73%	61.52%	33.48%	-19.26%	29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIFX and CAEIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009	0.82

The correlation between FWIFX and CAEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWIFX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIFX

FWIFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FWIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FWIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FWIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FWIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FWIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CAEIX

CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 82
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FWIFX	CAEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.51	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.25	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.43	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	5.14	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.83	16.42	-0.59

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIFX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIFX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIFX and CAEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWIFX	CAEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-75.81%	+42.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-8.39%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-24.57%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.71%	-32.58%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-37.54%	+3.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.72%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-48.51%	+42.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	2.62%	+0.15%

Volatility

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) at 6.76%. This indicates that FWIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWIFX	CAEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	6.76%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.14%	13.88%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.69%	17.21%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.17%	19.33%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	19.72%	-0.79%

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWIFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWIFX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

FWIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, more than CAEIX's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	0.61%	0.72%	1.17%	1.07%	0.86%	0.49%	0.82%	1.23%	2.00%	1.40%	1.79%	0.72%
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	9.37%	11.63%	14.80%	0.93%	6.23%	12.86%	8.16%	4.93%	9.72%	6.94%	1.17%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWIFX and CAEIX in my portfolio?

FWIFX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWIFX or CAEIX?

FWIFX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to CAEIX (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWIFX dropped -33.71% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.