FWCFX vs. MVGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX).
FWCFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. MVGIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 4, 2013.
Performance
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C | -7.06% | 14.91% | 47.60% | 23.61% | -26.54% | 17.21% | 29.53% | 27.53% | -5.55% | 28.20% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | -1.45% | 16.30% | 12.64% | 13.71% | -8.21% | 16.84% | 5.47% | 20.59% | -2.40% | 18.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWCFX achieves a -7.06% return, which is significantly lower than MVGIX's -1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FWCFX has outperformed MVGIX with an annualized return of 13.01%, while MVGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
FWCFX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
MVGIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWCFX has a 2.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MVGIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWCFX vs. MVGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FWCFX
MVGIX
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWCFX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.48 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 5.19 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWCFX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.86 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWCFX and MVGIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Dividend Comparison
FWCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%, more than MVGIX's 11.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C | 13.04% | 12.12% | 29.90% | 0.00% | 5.87% | 12.44% | 7.99% | 4.46% | 9.67% | 6.44% | 0.05% | 3.47% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | 11.10% | 10.94% | 7.84% | 1.88% | 3.98% | 9.43% | 1.55% | 2.79% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, which is greater than MVGIX's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWCFX and MVGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWCFX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -30.19% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -8.65% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.39% | -18.01% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.39% | -30.19% | -4.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.83% | -8.44% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -2.89% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.99% | +1.04% |
Volatility
FWCFX vs. MVGIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) at 3.22%. This indicates that FWCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWCFX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 3.22% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 5.74% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 10.51% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 10.51% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 12.38% | +7.01% |