FWAFX vs. MDGCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FWAFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX returned 14.80%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for MDGCX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWAFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.

Performance

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a 20.40% return, which is significantly higher than MDGCX's 18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX has outperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 14.80%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.45% annualized return.

FWAFX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 6M: 20.21%
• 1Y: 39.79%
• 3Y*: 25.05%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: 14.80%

MDGCX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 18.61%
• 6M: 19.84%
• 1Y: 38.66%
• 3Y*: 21.74%
• 5Y*: 11.44%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A	20.40%	15.83%	27.27%	24.62%	-25.96%	18.13%	30.57%	28.58%	-4.80%	29.15%
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	18.61%	23.61%	10.87%	22.43%	-17.94%	17.52%	15.61%	25.54%	-11.73%	23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FWAFX and MDGCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.93

The correlation between FWAFX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWAFX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWAFX

FWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MDGCX

MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWAFX	MDGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	3.10	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	4.17	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.56	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	4.84	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.94	22.38	-7.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWAFX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWAFX	MDGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	3.10	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.71	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.72	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.66	+0.11

Drawdowns

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and MDGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWAFX	MDGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-48.25%	+14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-8.07%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.67%	-21.46%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-26.68%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	-34.87%	+0.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-1.00%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-9.93%	+3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	1.74%	+0.98%

Volatility

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWAFX	MDGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	3.93%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	10.07%	+3.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	12.61%	+4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	16.15%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	17.25%	+1.57%

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWAFX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than MDGCX's 7.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A	9.61%	11.57%	14.70%	0.66%	6.00%	12.73%	8.01%	4.71%	9.43%	6.66%	0.88%	3.72%
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	7.51%	8.91%	7.78%	1.42%	1.75%	16.75%	3.77%	1.73%	4.06%	34.82%	0.65%	5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWAFX and MDGCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FWAFX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FWAFX or MDGCX?

FWAFX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to MDGCX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWAFX dropped -33.90% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.