PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWAFX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FWAFX having a 14.82% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 15.09%.


FWAFX

1D
1.11%
1M
8.01%
YTD
20.65%
6M
20.86%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
14.82%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWAFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A
20.65%15.83%27.27%24.62%-25.96%18.13%30.57%28.58%-4.80%29.15%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FWAFX and FSKAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between FWAFX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWAFX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWAFX
FWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWAFXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.38

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

15.52

-0.24

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWAFX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWAFXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.46

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.76

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.85

-0.08

Drawdowns

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWAFXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-35.01%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-8.92%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-19.43%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

-25.39%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-35.01%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-4.02%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

1.94%

+0.78%

Volatility

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWAFXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

2.97%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

9.23%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

12.26%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

17.41%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

18.46%

+0.36%

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWAFX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
FWAFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A
9.59%11.57%14.70%0.66%6.00%12.73%8.01%4.71%9.43%6.66%0.88%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FWAFX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWAFX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWAFX dropped -33.90% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWAFX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer